Turkey’s Afrin quagmire
What obvious even to the most prudent observers is that Turkey’s foreign policy is muddled. The more willingness Ankara displays to flex its muscles in the region, the less its evident strategic wisdom noted.
What remains is a series of hasty moves, mostly tactical. By the very nature of its foreign policy, Ankara appears unpredictable and vulnerable.
A dramatic example is the escalation with the mainly Kurdish enclave of Afrin in northern Syria, which is emerging as the epicentre of a violent conflict. After the defeat of the Islamic State (ISIS) in Syria with the help of the combat forces of the Kurdish Democratic Union Party (PYD), Turkey faces the regional Kurdish reality even more forcefully, while it continues to refuse its existence within its borders.
For the Syrian Kurds, Afrin as part of Rojava represents the dream of self-rule. Syrian Kurds’ political and militia groups act with the full knowledge that either Russia or the United States will likely somehow stand behind them and their demands as part of their efforts to bring peace to the country.
This is the muddle Turkey’s ruling Justice and Development Party (AKP) and its military establishment have been stuck in for some time.
A ground incursion in Afrin means not only facing an armed-to-the-teeth Kurdish militia but bold manoeuvring between the two major players in Syria: Washington and Moscow. So far, it has produced only backlash from all sides. The PYD declared that it would have to pull back its combat units from the areas where the Islamic State (ISIS) is being fought to Afrin “for defence.”
The United States made it clear that Turkish “violent acts,” as it expressed it, were unacceptable. The Syrian government issued a blunt statement saying that its forces would shoot down Turkish fighter planes if they entered its air space. Ever-calculating Moscow has not given a green light for Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan’s government to launch a military operation.
“Russia is an important supporter of the Kurdish cause,” Yasar Yakis, a former Turkish foreign minister, wrote for Ahval news site. “The draft constitution prepared for Syria by Russia proposes federal status for Kurds. Therefore, the United States and Russia may find an accommodation over the Kurdish question in Syria. The same reasoning goes for Bashar Assad’s stepping aside.
“These parameters offer the United States and Russia a possible area of convergence if political and military developments do not get out of control. Such an outcome would create serious disappointment in Turkey with both of them.”
The Kurdish military presence in Syria is, US Secretary of State Rex Tillerson said, a strategic component for American regional policy. However, it may be considered a more tactical one for Russian President Vladimir Putin, whose objective is to maintain a vassal regime in Damascus.
Taken altogether, however, this means increasing frustration for Erdogan as he raises his nationalist rhetoric to higher decibels and whips up a worrisome collective sense of aggression. The more convulsive Turkey’s newly forged Islamist-militarist coalition acts, the more lucidly it exposes its explosive Kurdish issue.
There is also another dimension that should be mentioned in the context of Erdogan raising the stakes regarding Syria. It may have to do with keeping the ties with Islamist aspirations in the region and beyond.
“The Muslim Brotherhood movements are on the back foot across the region, obviously, and they’re not represented in the region’s administrations but there is still probably an undercurrent of popular support for this ideology and Erdogan may be targeting that undercurrent of popular support,” Inan Demir, an emerging market economist with Nomura in London, told Ahval news site.
“I suspect when he makes these political statements, they are not only well received by his domestic base in Turkey but perhaps by the Muslim Brotherhood base in Egypt, maybe in Jordan and in [the Palestinian territories]. I think maybe he’s in this for the long run and counting on the day when Muslim Brotherhood groups in the region come back on the ascendency again.”
Whatever Erdogan’s intentions may be and regardless of Turkey launching a cross-border operation in Afrin, the question is whether Turkey has lost its bargaining power altogether. If so, what is to be expected next? No one knows the answers.