Sudanese leaders divided on normalisation with Israel

While civilian officials prefer to wait with any deal until after the US election, military leaders are said to seek a quick US-Sudan deal.
Monday 05/10/2020
A 2019 file picture shows Sudan’s Prime Minister Abdalla Hamdok speaking in Khartoum, Sudan. (REUTERS)
A 2019 file picture shows Sudan’s Prime Minister Abdalla Hamdok speaking in Khartoum, Sudan. (REUTERS)

KHARTOUM — Sudan’s fragile interim government is sharply divided over normalising relations with Israel, as it finds itself under intense pressure from the Trump administration to become the third Arab country to do so in short order — after the United Arab Emirates and Bahrain.

According to analysts, Washington’s push for Sudan-Israel ties is part of a campaign to score foreign policy achievements ahead of the US presidential election in November.

Sudan seemed like a natural candidate for the US pressure campaign as it struggles to be removed from a US list of states sponsoring terrorism. Sudan can only get the international loans and aid that are essential for reviving its battered economy once that label is removed.

While Sudan’s transitional government has been negotiating the terms of removing the country from the list for more than a year, US officials introduced the linkage to normalisation with Israel more recently.

Sudanese Sovereign Council Chair General Abdel Fattah el-Burhan (R) receives US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, last August. (AFP)
Sudanese Sovereign Council Chair General Abdel Fattah el-Burhan (R) receives US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, last August. (AFP)

Top Sudanese military leaders, who govern jointly with civilian technocrats in a Sovereign Council, have become increasingly vocal in their support for normalisation with Israel as part of a quick deal with Washington ahead of the US election.

“Now, whether we like it or not, the removal (of Sudan from the terror list) is tied to (normalisation) with Israel,” the deputy head of the council, Gen. Mohammed Dagalo, told a local television station last Friday.

“We need Israel … Israel is a developed country and the whole world is working with it,” he said. “We will have benefits from such relations … We hope all look at Sudan’s interests.”

Such comments would have been unthinkable until recently in a country where public hostility toward Israel remains strong.

The top civilian official in the coalition, Prime Minister Abdalla Hamdok, has argued that the transitional government does not have the mandate to decide on foreign policy issues of this magnitude.

When US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo visited Sudan last month, Hamdok urged him to move forward with removing Sudan from the list of state sponsors of terrorism and not link it to recognizing Israel.

“It needs a deep discussion within our society,” Hamdok told reporters earlier this week.

Several Sudanese officials, who spoke on condition of anonymity told the Associated Press civilian leaders prefer to wait with any deal until after the US election.

The officials said military leaders seek a quick US-Sudan deal, including normalisation with Israel, in exchange for an aid package. The officials said the military fears incentives being offered now could be withdrawn after the US election.

One sticking point is the size of future aid to Sudan. A meeting in Abu Dhabi last month — attended by Sudanese, US and Emirati officials — ended without agreement.

Less than $1 billion in cash was being offered said a Sudanese official who took part in the meetings. The Sudanese team, had asked for $3 billion to help rescue Sudan’s economy.

Dagalo, the military official, tweeted Friday, after meeting with the US envoy to Sudan, Donald Booth, in South Sudan that he received a promise to remove Sudan from the terror list “as soon as possible.”

An Israeli official said the talks on normalisation remain purely between the US and Sudan.

“We’re still not there,” said the official, who spoke on condition of anonymity because he was discussing a confidential diplomatic matter. He said the Israeli government hopes a deal can be wrapped up before the US election on Nov. 3.

For Israel, a cordial relationship with Sudan would be a symbolic victory.

Sudan, a Muslim-majority Arab and African country, has long said it supports the Palestinian people in their calls for an independent state. Khartoum hosted the historic Arab League summit after the 1967 Mideast War in which Israel captured the West Bank, Gaza Strip and east Jerusalem — lands the Palestinians seek for that state. The conference approved a resolution that became known as the “three no’s” — no peace with Israel, no recognition of Israel and no negotiations.

The designation of Sudan as a “state sponsor of terrorism” dates to the 1990s, when the nation briefly hosted Osama bin Laden and other wanted militants. Sudan was also believed to have served as a pipeline for Iran to supply weapons to Palestinian militant groups in the Gaza Strip.

Osman Mirghani, a Sudanese analyst and editor of the daily newspaper al-Tayar, said Sudanese leaders don’t have unlimited time to decide.

“The US offer of incentives .. will not last too long. It is related to the US presidential election on one side, and the number of Arab states that normalise,” he said.

With Sudan’s long-time autocratic leader Omar al-Bashir deposed and facing war crimes and other charges, Sudan’s transitional authorities believe that the reasons behind the terrorism listing have evaporated.

But many in the US maintain Sudan should atone for its previous government’s actions.

Sudan has already agreed with the US State Department, in theory, to a compensation deal for victims of the 1998 bombings of the American embassies in Kenya and Tanzania, which were orchestrated by bin Laden’s al-Qaida network while he was living in Sudan.

However, questions about the fairness of the proposed compensation deal to non-American victims, including those who were working for the embassies and have subsequently become US citizens, have stalled its consideration in Congress which must approve the agreement.

Meanwhile, some families of the victims of the September 11 attacks have also started procedures to claim compensation from Sudan, though the country’s links to that terror plot are less clear. Their complaint has complicated the embassy bombing compensation deal and could further deter the US Congress from removing Sudan from the list.

In the meantime, Sudan’s government realises it has only so many cards to play.

“We should get ourselves off that list, which the US is using as leverage to get some benefits out of the relationship that it has with Sudan, which is completely legitimate,” Sudan’s acting Foreign Minister Omar Qamar al-Din told reporters in Geneva last month.