As modern institutions collapse, Iraqi tribes make a comeback

Tribes have become among the most powerful actors in Iraq's rural and oil-rich south.
Tuesday 17/12/2019
Powerful actors. Armed members of Karbala clans lift their guns as they take to the streets, December 8.  (AFP)
Powerful actors. Armed members of Karbala clans lift their guns as they take to the streets, December 8. (AFP)

BAGHDAD - Iraqi protesters have clashed with police and torched government offices, a prime minister has resigned and blood spilt. As modern institutions collapse, a centuries-old force is making a comeback: Iraq's tribes.

With their own hierarchies, moral and justice codes, as well as huge arms caches, tribes have become among the most powerful actors in Iraq's rural and oil-rich south.

They have a history of revolt, turning against the British colonising forces in a major boost to the 1920 uprising that led to the country's independence. A century later, revolution has hit Iraq again.

Baghdad and the Shia-majority region have been rocked by two months of the most serious unrest since the 2003 US-led invasion that toppled Saddam Hussein. Anti-regime protesters burned state headquarters and party offices in outrage at corruption, poor public services and Iran's perceived political interference.

It has been the perfect storm in which Iraq's tribes could reassert their leadership, said Phillip Smyth of the Washington Institute for Near East Policy. In recent years, many Shias had "become more urbanised and have loosened up their identity when it comes to being tribal," he said.

Young people, who make up 60% of Iraq's population, were particularly prone to look outward and shed their tribal identities.

"But the reason the tribes have a lot more strength now is that you have a very weak central government and an outside power -- the Iranians -- that is viewed as being complicit with this government," Smyth said. "These guys are looking at this and saying, let's revert back to sources of power that we know."

Nasiriya, in southern Iraq, is a prime example.

Authorities dispatched commander Jamil al-Shammary in late November to snuff out widespread rallies in the city but tribal fighters came out in force, cutting off roads to prevent troops from reaching Nasiriya.

They negotiated a halt to the bloodshed, which claimed 97 lives since protests erupted in October.

"It was the tribes that found a solution to the crisis while the politicians did nothing," said Qaysar al-Husseinawi, a leading figure in Nasiriya's Husseinat tribe.

Their role did not stop there. The clans were seeking justice for around 100 families pursuing legal cases against Shammary, himself a member of a powerful tribe. Shammary's clan has excommunicated him over the crackdown.

Tribal tradition dictates that "blood money" must be paid to the victims' families. Otherwise, they have the right to seek equally violent vengeance.

Influential clan structures have intervened to end bloodshed but, if the tribes choose to take up arms, many in the south expect full-blown conflict. One police officer said he'd rather desert than fight them. "The state could never protect its own men against tribal law," he said.

Indeed, tribal tradition often trumps state law in Iraq, with accused criminals being released after tribal talks and even marital disputes resolved by mediators.

The tribes blend modern life and centuries-old tradition, with sheikhs juggling two iPhones while ordering wave after wave of sugary tea served to guests.

In the southernmost province of Basra, armed tribe members have shut the streets outside national or even international oil companies to demand well-paid jobs.

"The social bargain of any tribe is that the sheikh is a river to his people," providing them with work, justice and stability, said Nicholas Heras of the Centre for a New American Security, a think-tank in Washington.

Naturally, the widespread upheaval in recent weeks over unemployment and poor services touched tribes, too.

"Tribal anger is directed at leaders in Baghdad who are viewed as having not kept their part of the social bargain," Heras said.

The British colonising forces had a tribal revolt on their hands in the early 1900s after they arrested a tribal sheikh over a tax issue. Nearly a century later, tribal support for the anti-government movement can be linked to push-back against central government authority in distant Baghdad.

Resolving the dispute won't be so simple, however.

"A lot of bridges have been burned," said Smyth. "If you have people fundamentally angry at how institutions are corrupt, mismanaged and just bad, you won't just get bought off with a job."

The government may seek to appease tribes with offers of more jobs or services but there is no guarantee they could keep their support for long.

"You can never buy tribal groupings," said Smyth, pointing to their often-shifting tactical allegiances. "They're for rent."

(AFP)