Maliki-Barzani feud in Iraq is music to ISIS ears

Sunday 06/11/2016
Iraqi Kurdish Regional Government President Masoud Barzani

LONDON - A war of words has bro­ken out between former Iraqi prime minister Nuri al-Maliki and Ma­soud Barzani, president of the semi-autonomous Kurdistan region, fuelling tensions surround­ing the war raging around Mosul.
Maliki threw the first punch in a broadcast interview, accusing Barzani and other leaders of his Kurdistan Democratic Party (KDP) of being “Israeli sympathisers” who were working with Iraq’s for­eign enemies, including the United States, Israel and Turkey.
“The Kurdistan region has be­come a strategic and developed platform for the implementation of the US-Israeli policy,” Maliki told Euronews. “And by Kurdistan I do not mean all the Kurds. I mean only Masoud Barzani and the Kurdistan Democratic Party.”
He also accused the KDP of facili­tating the entry of 2,000 Turkish troops into northern Iraq, a devel­opment that has strained relations between Ankara and the Baghdad government of Prime Minister Haider al-Abadi, who has said their presence was illegal.
It seemed unlikely, however, that Maliki’s intervention was motivat­ed by a desire to support his suc­cessor. Recent political develop­ments support the theory that he is manoeuvring to regain the prime ministerial post he was forced to surrender in mid-2014 after his armed forces lost Mosul to the Is­lamic State (ISIS).
Maliki has been accused of stir­ring up existing splits within rival Kurdish parties with a visit in July to Sulaymaniyah in eastern Kurd­istan where the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan and the Movement for Change (Gorran) hold sway.
In September, the Iraqi parlia­ment dismissed Hoshyar Zebari, the Finance minister, in a move that many, including Zebari him­self, said was engineered by Maliki. Zebari was the most high-profile Kurd in successive Baghdad cabi­nets and, as Foreign minister, fre­quently accompanied Maliki on visits abroad. He also holds high positions in the KDP — and, inci­dentally, is Barzani’s uncle.
The personal animus between Maliki and Barzani was well-estab­lished before the former launched his tirade in late October. Back in 2012, the Kurdish leader accused the Shia prime minister of turning himself into a dictator.
“Where in the world can the same person be the prime minis­ter, the chief of staff of the armed forces, the minister of Defence, the minister of Interior, the chief of in­telligence and the head of the Na­tional Security Council?” Barzani said.
The KDP was not slow in re­sponding in the latest verbal spat. “Maliki’s role in inciting sectarian­ism, his involvement in corruption and the damage he has done to Iraq’s political, security and eco­nomic standing is evident to all Iraqis and to the international com­munity,” the party said in a state­ment.
It also compared him to Saddam Hussein’s notorious henchman “Chemical Ali” — Ali Hassan al- Majid — in terms of crimes he had committed against the Kurdish nation, especially the March 1988 chemical weapons attack on the Kurdish town of Halabja in which more than 5,000 men, women and children were killed.
The statement added, for good measure, that the army Maliki con­trolled had collapsed without a fight in the face of the ISIS offensive in 2014, relinquishing territory that the Kurdish peshmerga and the re­constituted Iraqi armed forces are now jointly fighting to liberate.
So, what of Maliki’s allegations that Barzani is an Israeli and a Turk­ish stooge? The KDP’s relations with Israel are well-documented from the era when Israel’s Mossad intelligence service supported the 1970s rebellion led by Barzani’s father, Mustafa, and subsequently ditched the Kurds as part of a 1975 agreement between Saddam and the shah of Iran.
Maliki gave little evidence of a conspiracy beyond saying: “Israeli sympathisers and elements are abundant in Kurdistan.”
On Turkey, he may have been on slightly more solid ground. The KDP has a close relationship with Ankara, based in part on the level of Turkish investment in the land-locked Kurdistan region and de­pendence on Turkey as an outlet for oil exports.
The authorities in Erbil, cast­ing themselves as peacemakers in the tensions between Ankara and Baghdad, insist that the presence of Turkish military “trainers” at Bashiqa, on the front line with ISIS, had been signed off by the central government. KDP officials say they welcome the participation of any party that opposes ISIS.
Maliki perhaps has a different agenda. Shortly before his verbal assault on Barzani, he said during an Iranian-sponsored conference in Baghdad that the campaign to liberate Mosul was just the first step to liberating other cities, in­cluding Raqqa, the Islamic State’s de facto capital, in Syria.
That implied liberation by the Iranian-backed forces of Syrian President Bashar Assad rather than by rebels backed by Turkey and the West.
The Maliki-Barzani spat perhaps underlines, once again, the fact that what divides the enemies of the Islamic State is greater than what unites them.