Iraqis relying on tribal justice amid lawlessness

Sunday 11/09/2016
Iraqi Sunni fighters from Jubur tribe

BAGHDAD - Following the 2003 US-led coalition invasion of Iraq and subsequent de- Ba’athification process, Iraq was left with a dis­tinct lack of security. Widespread looting, kidnappings and other crimes spread across the country because no firm security sector was in place.
The security gap allowed an as­sortment of non-state actors to fill that role. A mix of terrorist groups, militias and tribes took advantage of the situation. The majority of Ira­qi citizens are associated with one tribe or another.
As described by American po­litical scientist Robert Rotberg, a failed state is one that has lost the monopoly over the “means of co­ercion” over its citizens. By this definition, Iraq is a failed state as non-state actors have increasingly greater powers in Iraq.
The result of such extensive use of violence has led many Iraqis to turn to their tribes for protection. Hayder al-Mohammad, a professor of anthropology at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, said Iraqis proudly boast of their reliance on tribes. Mohammad, writing in 2011, quoted one Iraqi as saying: “You have car insurance, we have tribes.”
Across the Arab world, tribes find their roots in the pre-Islamic era, applying tribal law across the region they rule. The presence of tribal law interferes with the state’s ability to enforce law and therefore achieve the desired state due to the strong influence of non-state actors.
Within Iraq, tribes have set rules and have associated punishments for each perceived crime. According to Karen Blue Carroll, professor of political science at Vanderbilt Uni­versity, regarding the tribes of Iraq “there appears to be relatively little variation in the structure, specifics, or processes of law from tribe to tribe, and this facilitates the settle­ment of disputes between them”.
Crimes, according to tribes, vary from showing disrespect for a tribe, such as the pulling of a tribal leader’s headwear, to sexist punish­ments, such as allowing a female non-virgin to marry another tribal member. When committed, such crimes are presented to a tribal council and tribal leaders see if they reach a settlement. The majority of settlements are reached through what is known as fasel — blood mon­ey. Should the money not be paid, the victim is threatened with death.
Essentially, crimes are whatever a culprit perceives to be a crime. The consequence of this has led to an environment of fear, especially within the public service sector.
As an example, doctors shy away from risky, but potentially life-sav­ing procedures, for fear of being blamed for the complications. Be­cause of a lack of a state, patients and their families present patient complications to their tribes and doctors are blamed for various com­plications of the life-saving proce­dures.
Many doctors reported that their homes have been painted with the words: “In debt of blood.” The doc­tors face either paying the blood money or death. As a consequence, there has been a mass exodus of Iraqi doctors. Those who have not been able to escape the threats have stopped performing risky proce­dures, putting other patients at risk.
A 2011 study by Carroll stated that since 2003 the average cost of blood money has been steadily ris­ing. Accordingly, some Iraqis see blood money as an opportunity to get relatively easy money by creat­ing problems that they can present to their tribes and claim money for.
In general, the organisation of a tribe is a vertical structure in which tribal decisions are made by a hand­ful of leaders. This kind of system undermines the democratically elected leadership and has a great potential for further corruption.
The effect of tribes on the recent history of Iraq, however, has not always been negative. Through the use of the Awakening movement in 2011, tribal leaders agreed to co­operate with the Iraqi government in bringing an end to sectarian vio­lence and ridding Falluja of terrorist groups.
At various times, the Iraqi gov­ernment has tried to change the role of the tribes. The British, ini­tially through the Tribal Disputes Act of 1916, which was adopted by King Faisal in 1924, gave permis­sion for tribal law to be enforced across the country except Bagh­dad. During his presidency, Abdel Karim Qassim expanded the act across the country. However, fol­lowing the rise of Saddam Hussein, contrary to the Ba’ath party prin­ciples, he gave increasing powers to tribes loyal to him following the 1991 uprising.
In a country plagued by corrup­tion, it is not surprising that the citi­zens of Iraq have looked elsewhere for means of security and stability. The centuries-old tribes are not ex­pected to be defunct anytime soon. However, for the country to achieve true justice, stability and no fear of unjust violent retributions, the Iraqi state needs to create and im­plement a criminal justice system, preventing citizens seeking justice through their tribes. This cannot be achieved without the faith of the Iraqi people in their government, something that is absent from Iraqi politics.