Iran’s judiciary gets dragged into the political dogfight

Sunday 29/01/2017
Iranian Parliament Speaker Ali Larijani speaks during a press conference in the capital Tehran in December. (AFP)

Beirut - Iran’s 1979 constitution pro­claimed the judiciary “an inde­pendent power” headed by a “just mujtahid” — expert in Is­lamic law — but the interweav­ing of religion and politics in the Islamic Republic soon undermined the assertion as judges such as Sadeq Khalkhali dealt swiftly with leading figures of the old regime and others opposing the new one.
Appointed for a 5-year term by the supreme leader, Iran’s judici­ary chief is assigned an apparently modest responsibility for the “or­ganisational structure of the judicial system” but post-holders have been powerful figures. Ayatollah Moham­mad Yazdi, judiciary chief from 1989-99, went on to lead the Assem­bly of Experts, the elected body that chooses the supreme leader.
His successor, Ayatollah Mahmoud Hashemi Shahroudi (1999-2009), is today considered a possible successor to Ayatollah Ali Khamenei as supreme leader. So too is current judiciary chief, Sadegh Larijani, appointed by Khamenei in 2009 aged just 48.
Larijani has few qualms about entering the political fray, which is heating up as the May presidential election approaches. At the same time, the January 8th death of Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani, a major politi­cal figure for decades, at the age of 82 has further highlighted Khame­nei’s mortality as he nears his 78th birthday, also in May.
Relations between the judiciary head and president have long been tetchy. Iranian President Hassan Rohani has pressed for leniency for Mir-Hossein Mousavi and Me­hdi Karroubi, leaders of the 2009 reformist green movement under house arrest. In November, Larijani and Rohani traded accusations that the other wanted to close newspa­pers.
The rivalry intensified at the be­ginning of January when Larijani al­leged Rohani took contributions for his 2013 presidential campaign from Babak Zanjani, a businessman in­volved in evading Western oil sanc­tions who in 2016 was sentenced to death for embezzlement and “spreading corruption on Earth”.
While principlists often denounce technocrats linked to Rohani’s gov­ernment, usually over high pay or perks, this is the first time the presi­dent has faced such fire.
Larijani was responding, how­ever, to Rohani’s criticisms in De­cember of judicial handling of the Zanjani case.
The president suggested Iranians wondered where an alleged missing $3 billion from oil sales had gone, pointing out that no answer would be forthcoming if Zanjani were exe­cuted. Rohani and Larijani each de­manded the other publish transpar­ent accounts, respectively, for 2013 election expenses and the judiciary.
Farideh Farhi, of the University of Hawaii, puts the president ahead on points, saying: “I think Larijani has proven he’s no match for Rohani in the public arena. His angry responses to Rohani’s cool pokes revealed a suspect temperament, which is important for the position of the leader. Khamenei will defend the judiciary as an institution, in public, but not the man who heads it.”
Whoever leads on points, such a bitter public spat between two sen­ior figures does not augur well for a smooth presidential election in May, when Rohani is expected to seek a second term. The potential for conflict might be even greater if, as many suspect, both Larijani and Rohani are would-be successors to Khamenei as leader, a decision to be taken in due course by the 88 clerics on the Assembly of Experts.
“The presidential election is im­portant,” said an Iranian academic, “but the main goal is the succession to Ayatollah Khamenei. Both Ro­hani and Larijani have a chance only if they are still in their positions, as the head of judiciary and govern­ment. If Rohani loses in May, his chances will be near zero of being the next leader.”
The public row might benefit other potential candidates for leader — notably Shahroudi and Ebrahim Raeisi, appointed by Khamenei in 2016 to head the Imam Reza shrine in Mashhad but its tone and content threaten to bring the political system into disrepute at a time when Iran may face stronger pressure from US President Donald Trump.
Hence Khamenei’s warning to Larijani and Rohani in a speech in Qom, expressing his hope that “re­cent arguments” would be resolved “with the help of God”.
“I expect trying times for the lead­er,” said Farhi. “He’s had a rough time playing a balancer since 2009, in some ways ceding it to Rafsanjani after he’d publicly acknowledged his own preference for the views of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad [funda­mentalist president, 2005-13].”
Perhaps the leader’s worries also surfaced in his condolence letter for Rafsanjani, who spent much of his long career managing disputes within Iran’s fractious political elite. Noting his differences of opinion with Rafsanjani “in recent years”, Khamenei wrote that the “dev­ils working… to take advantage of those differences… could never in­fluence his deep individual affection for humble me”.
In stressing his links with Rafsan­jani — calling him in funeral prayers at Tehran University a “companion for 59 years” — Khamenei may have thought of the future as well as the past.
Iran’s leader must wonder how well the succeeding generation, in­cluding Rohani and Larijani, will overcome their differences in the in­terests of the Islamic Republic.