Americans have the right to hear from BDS leader
I awakened in early April to listen to a voicemail message from Omar Barghouti, a leading member of the Palestinian Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions movement.
Barghouti said he was at Ben Gurion Airport and, despite holding a valid US visa and a boarding pass for a flight to Washington, the airline would not let him board the plane. He was informed that US immigration officials had notified the airline that he was being barred from entering the United States.
We had invited Barghouti to Washington to speak at educational programmes and have him meet with members of Congress or their staffs. Apparently, it was this sort of dialogue and education that the Trump administration did not want to occur.
While polling indicates that a plurality of Americans support the Palestinians’ right to call for a boycott to protest Israel’s settlement expansion and persistent violation of Palestinian human rights, in Congress and in state capitals around the United States there is an anti-Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) hysteria.
This near-feverish campaign to penalise individuals and entities that support BDS has succeeded in more than two dozen states and is the subject of several measures and resolutions before Congress.
Because the language in the congressional resolutions, we believe, mischaracterises the BDS movement and misquotes Barghouti, we felt it would be important to have him in Washington to directly address the concerns of legislators and policymakers.
Three events were planned: a discussion moderated by Peter Beinart, a leading American Jewish intellectual who writes for the Atlantic magazine and the Jewish Forward newspaper; a conversation with young Jewish and Arab Americans (co-hosted with Jewish Voice for Peace); and a briefing for congressional staff.
We wrote to the original co-sponsors of the congressional legislation asking them to privately meet with Barghouti. There were also programmes scheduled at Harvard University, New York University and a major synagogue in Chicago.
When confronted by Barghouti’s denial of entry it was decided, nevertheless, to go forward with the programme, conducting two of the scheduled Washington sessions via Skype. It was not the way we had hoped to have this dialogue but we were determined that it was important to have this conversation and not allow our effort to be completely derailed by the administration’s decision to prevent us from hearing from Barghouti directly.
Listening to Barghouti’s responses to questions from Beinart and the audience, it became clear why pro-Israel groups and supporters in “official Washington” are so afraid of letting Barghouti be heard. His answers were informed and smart and his explanation of the BDS movement was compelling.
However, seeing Barghouti via a large screen on wheels on the stage meant that we were all undoubtedly missing his presence, imposing a distance between us that extended the sense of Palestinians as the “other” and hindered our ability to have a back and forth with him as a real person.
As I expected, when it became clear that we did not cancel the events, opponents of BDS reacted negatively. One congressional critic, US Representative Lee Zeldin, a Republican from New York, issued a release that applauded the barring of Barghouti, denouncing him in especially harsh language.
Zeldin’s statement said: “We have witnessed the rise of anti-Semitism and anti-Israel hate throughout the world, in our nation, on college campuses and within the halls of Congress and whether this bigotry is brazen or shamefully masked as ‘legitimate’ we must reject it… Barghouti’s anti-Israel and anti-Semitic hate must not be tolerated, empowered or embraced and I applaud the administration’s denial of his entry to the United States.”
We had hoped that if Zeldin had a chance to meet with Barghouti in person, he would have developed a better understanding of the movement and the man.
Zeldin’s remarks echoed the views of US President Donald Trump’s special envoy on anti-Semitism who, when asked for the reason why Barghouti was barred from entering the United States, first said he could not comment on the case but then denounced both Barghouti and the BDS movement as anti-Semitic.
We have been gratified that the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and PEN America have been forthright in joining with us to protest the barring of Barghouti’s entry into the United States.
The ACLU statement read: “This looks like an ideological exclusion, which is a long-discredited form of government censorship that prevents Americans from meeting with and hearing from a speaker whose views the government dislikes… it’s a disgrace and a violation of Americans’ First Amendment rights.”
The administration’s exclusion of Barghouti has intensified attacks on BDS and I am under no illusion that logic or appeals to justice alone will easily win out.
We live in disturbing times. There is a poisonous political climate in Washington and the anti-BDS hysteria has become a part of it. When some key Democratic senators and members of Congress opposed an early effort to pass an anti-BDS bill because it violated the free speech rights of Americans, Republicans pounced and attacked Democrats as being insufficiently supportive of Israel and even accused them of enabling anti-Semitism.
If this current is left unchecked, I can imagine the day, in the not-too-distant future, when a congressional hearing will open with a member grilling a witness with a McCarthy-era question: “Are you now or have you ever been a supporter of the BDS movement?”
It is precisely because so much is at stake that we are determined to push back. It has become imperative for us to fight against the effort to deny the Palestinian people’s right to peacefully resist the occupation and the intensified violation of their basic rights.
It is an unacceptable outrage for anyone to term as anti-Semitic the Palestinian call to support their efforts for justice, equality and human rights and, given the hysteria that has accompanied the anti-BDS push, it has also become imperative for us to protect our First Amendment rights in the United States to talk face-to-face with those leaders who advance Palestinian rights in the face of regressive, discriminatory policies or arbitrary decisions.
Now is not the time to silence debate or the free and open exchange of views on issues of critical national importance.